Unlock Camaro Production Numbers: Shocking Stats!

The Chevrolet division of General Motors maintains a detailed record of Camaro production numbers, reflecting the model’s performance in the competitive automotive market. Understanding these figures requires analyzing market trends, consumer preferences, and factors influencing sales that impact the Camaro’s assembly plants across North America. These Camaro production numbers are often a key indicator of the vehicle’s collectibility and are frequently analyzed by enthusiasts, restoration specialists and other collectors, as they provide valuable information for enthusiasts.

The Chevrolet Camaro.

The very name conjures images of roaring engines, sleek lines, and the open road. More than just a car, the Camaro is a cultural icon, a symbol of American muscle and automotive ingenuity that has captivated enthusiasts for generations.

From its inception in the late 1960s to its recent, bittersweet departure, the Camaro has continuously evolved, adapting to changing times while staying true to its performance-oriented roots.

An Icon is Born

The Camaro emerged as Chevrolet’s answer to the burgeoning pony car market, spearheaded by the Ford Mustang. It quickly established itself as a serious contender, offering a potent combination of style, power, and affordability.

The first generation, with its distinctive Coke-bottle shape and a wide array of engine options, immediately resonated with buyers. It cemented the Camaro’s place in automotive history.

More Than Just a Car

The Camaro’s appeal extends far beyond its performance specifications. It represents a spirit of freedom, individuality, and a passion for driving. It’s a car that has starred in countless films, graced magazine covers, and inspired a dedicated community of owners and enthusiasts.

Its enduring popularity is a testament to its timeless design and the emotional connection it fosters.

Unveiling the Numbers: A Statistical Journey

This article embarks on a data-driven journey through the production history of this legendary vehicle. We aim to move beyond the anecdotes and delve into the actual production numbers across all generations of the Camaro.

By analyzing these figures, we hope to uncover surprising trends, identify peak production periods, and gain a deeper understanding of the factors that influenced the Camaro’s success.

We will examine not just the overall numbers, but also the variations in production across different models, special editions, and assembly plants.

Prepare to discover the untold story of the Camaro, as revealed through the lens of its production statistics, offering new insights into this iconic American muscle car.

Unveiling the Numbers: A Statistical Journey

This article embarks on a data-driven journey through the production history of this legendary vehicle. We aim to move beyond the anecdotes and delve into the actual production numbers across all generations of the Camaro.

By analyzing these figures, we hope to uncover surprising trends, identify peaks and valleys in production, and ultimately gain a deeper understanding of the Camaro’s place in automotive history. But to truly appreciate the story these numbers tell, we must first understand the context in which the Camaro was produced.

The Foundation: Chevrolet and General Motors’ Role

The Camaro’s story isn’t just about the car itself; it’s also intertwined with the history and strategies of Chevrolet and its parent company, General Motors (GM). Understanding their roles is crucial for interpreting the production figures and appreciating the forces that shaped the Camaro’s destiny.

Chevrolet’s Commitment: More Than Just a Model

For Chevrolet, the Camaro has always represented more than just another model in its lineup. It was Chevrolet’s entry into the highly competitive pony car market, a segment dominated by the Ford Mustang.

The Camaro was designed to capture the hearts of younger buyers, projecting an image of performance and style.
Chevrolet invested heavily in the Camaro, not only in its design and engineering but also in its marketing and promotion.

This commitment was reflected in the wide range of engine options, trim levels, and special editions offered throughout the Camaro’s history. The Camaro also served as a halo car for Chevrolet, drawing attention to the brand and showcasing its engineering capabilities. Its success was directly tied to the overall health and perception of the Chevrolet brand.

General Motors’ Broader Strategy: Navigating the Automotive Landscape

While Chevrolet was responsible for the Camaro’s development and marketing, General Motors (GM) played a crucial role in shaping its production.

GM’s overall strategy, including its investment decisions, production planning, and long-term vision, significantly influenced the Camaro’s fate. GM’s decisions about resource allocation and platform sharing impacted the Camaro’s development and production cycles.

For instance, the third-generation Camaro shared its F-body platform with the Pontiac Firebird, a decision that affected both models’ design and performance characteristics. Furthermore, GM’s focus on different market segments and its response to evolving consumer preferences played a significant role in determining the Camaro’s production volume.

Economic Factors: The Unseen Hand

Economic factors exerted a powerful influence on GM’s production decisions, including those related to the Camaro. Economic recessions, fuel crises, and changing consumer tastes all had a direct impact on demand for the Camaro.

For example, the oil crisis of the 1970s led to a decline in demand for muscle cars, which in turn resulted in lower production numbers for the second-generation Camaro. Conversely, periods of economic prosperity and lower fuel prices often saw a resurgence in Camaro sales.

GM also had to consider factors such as labor costs, material prices, and government regulations when making production decisions. These economic realities often dictated the feasibility and profitability of producing the Camaro. As the market changed, so too did the Camaro, but it also had periods of stagnation during economic pressures that changed GM’s product line strategy.

Decoding the Numbers: A Generational Production Overview

Having established the foundational role of Chevrolet and General Motors in the Camaro’s trajectory, we now turn our attention to the core of our investigation: the production numbers themselves. By dissecting the figures from each generation, we can illuminate the factors that influenced the Camaro’s popularity, its market position, and ultimately, its survival.

First Generation Camaro (1967-1969): The Dawn of a Legend

The first generation Camaro burst onto the scene, a direct response to Ford’s Mustang, igniting the pony car wars. Its initial success was fueled by sharp styling, a wide array of options, and a performance image that resonated with younger buyers.

Peak Production and Early Success

1967 stands as the peak production year for the first generation, with a strong market eager for Chevrolet’s challenger. The novelty of a new model, combined with extensive marketing efforts, contributed significantly to this initial surge.

The availability of various engines, from economical six-cylinders to potent V8s, broadened the Camaro’s appeal, attracting a diverse range of customers. This strategic approach helped Chevrolet secure a significant foothold in the burgeoning pony car market.

Model Year Production Analysis

A detailed examination of production figures for each model year (1967, 1968, and 1969) reveals subtle shifts in consumer preferences. For example, the introduction of specific performance packages or cosmetic changes often correlated with increased sales in a particular year.

The 1969 model year saw some decline as the design changed for the next decade and muscle car era. The impact of these shifts underscores the importance of continuous innovation and adaptation in the automotive industry.

The Z/28 Effect

The Z/28 special edition, with its high-revving 302 cubic inch V8, had a profound impact on the Camaro’s image. While not produced in massive quantities compared to base models, the Z/28 cemented the Camaro’s reputation as a serious performance machine.

Its success on the racetrack further enhanced its appeal, attracting enthusiasts and bolstering overall Camaro sales. The Z/28 served as a halo model, demonstrating the Camaro’s performance potential and inspiring a generation of gearheads.

Second Generation Camaro (1970-1981): Navigating the Oil Crisis

The second-generation Camaro, with its European-inspired styling, represented a departure from the original. However, it also faced unprecedented challenges, most notably the oil crisis of the 1970s, which significantly impacted the entire automotive industry.

Production Shifts and the Oil Crisis

The oil crisis led to increased fuel prices and stricter emissions regulations, forcing automakers to rethink their approach to performance and fuel efficiency. This era saw a decline in the production of high-horsepower engines and a greater focus on smaller, more economical alternatives.

The Camaro, like many other muscle cars, suffered as a result of these changes. Production numbers fluctuated, reflecting the uncertain economic climate and shifting consumer preferences.

Comparing Generations: A Tale of Two Eras

Compared to the first generation, the second generation generally experienced lower overall production numbers. While the first generation benefited from the initial excitement of a new market segment, the second generation had to contend with economic headwinds and changing consumer tastes.

This comparison highlights the significant impact of external factors on automotive production and sales. The second generation Camaro had to adapt to more difficult external factors.

Design Changes and Their Impact

Design changes throughout the second generation also influenced production numbers. Facelifts and minor updates were implemented to keep the Camaro fresh and appealing, but these changes often had a limited impact on overall sales.

This underscores the fact that design alone cannot overcome broader economic or regulatory challenges. Design improvements were not enough to keep the Camaro afloat during challenging times.

Third and Fourth Generation Camaro (1982-2002): A Muscle Car Decline

The third and fourth generations of the Camaro faced a new challenge: a general decline in the popularity of muscle cars. As consumer tastes shifted towards smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles, the Camaro struggled to maintain its market share.

The Muscle Car’s Fading Star

The 1980s and 1990s witnessed a gradual erosion of the muscle car market. Factors such as rising insurance costs, stricter emissions regulations, and changing demographics contributed to this decline.

The Camaro, once a symbol of American muscle, found itself increasingly out of step with prevailing consumer preferences. Buyers were looking for more fuel efficiency, safety, and practicality.

Production Figures and Contributing Factors

Production figures for the third and fourth generations reflect this decline. Sales steadily decreased over time, with occasional upticks driven by new model introductions or special editions.

However, the overall trend was downward, indicating a fundamental shift in the automotive market. The market no longer favored muscle cars as they had done in the past.

The End of an Era

The eventual hiatus of the Camaro in 2002 marked the end of an era. After 35 years of continuous production, the Camaro was discontinued due to declining sales and a lack of investment in new models.

The demise of the fourth-generation Camaro served as a stark reminder of the cyclical nature of the automotive industry. Even iconic models can fall victim to changing market conditions.

Fifth Generation Camaro (2010-2015): A Triumphant Return

The fifth-generation Camaro represented a successful comeback for the iconic muscle car. Capitalizing on nostalgia and a renewed interest in performance vehicles, Chevrolet resurrected the Camaro in 2010, and the results were remarkable.

Revival of an Icon

The fifth-generation Camaro was a critical and commercial success. Its retro-inspired styling, combined with modern technology and performance, resonated with a new generation of buyers, as well as those who remembered the original.

Chevrolet’s decision to bring back the Camaro proved to be a shrewd move, injecting new life into the brand and reigniting the muscle car wars. The design was a perfect balance between modern and retro styling.

Post-Relaunch Production Surge

Production figures after the relaunch reflected the Camaro’s newfound popularity. Sales soared, surpassing those of its primary competitor, the Ford Mustang, in some years. The Camaro was once again a force to be reckoned with in the performance car market.

This success demonstrated the enduring appeal of the Camaro brand and the power of nostalgia in the automotive industry. The comeback showcased how great design and timing can revive a classic.

Styling, Performance, and Increased Sales

The fifth-generation Camaro’s success can be attributed to a combination of factors, including its aggressive styling, potent engine options, and improved handling. Chevrolet invested heavily in the Camaro’s performance capabilities, offering a range of engines from a fuel-efficient V6 to a powerful V8.

This commitment to performance, combined with the Camaro’s eye-catching design, helped drive sales and solidify its position as a leader in the muscle car segment. The Camaro’s performance became a key selling point for the generation.

Sixth Generation Camaro (2016-2024): Navigating a Changing Landscape

The sixth-generation Camaro faced a different set of challenges. While it offered improved performance and handling compared to its predecessor, it also had to contend with a changing automotive landscape increasingly dominated by SUVs and electric vehicles.

Shifting Market Trends and Production Challenges

The rise of SUVs and crossovers has significantly impacted the market for traditional passenger cars, including muscle cars. Consumers are increasingly prioritizing practicality, versatility, and fuel efficiency, which has led to a decline in sales for many sports cars.

The sixth-generation Camaro, despite its performance credentials, struggled to compete with these evolving market trends. Buyers had different priorities now than they had previously.

Market Influence on Production

Market trends directly influenced the sixth-generation Camaro’s production numbers. Sales steadily declined throughout its production run, reflecting the broader shift away from traditional passenger cars.

Chevrolet attempted to address these challenges by offering new trim levels, special editions, and performance upgrades, but these efforts had limited success in reversing the overall downward trend. No changes were enough to shift the overall trajectory.

Discontinuation and Future Plans

The eventual discontinuation of the Camaro after the 2024 model year marked another turning point in the car’s history. While Chevrolet has not ruled out the possibility of a future Camaro model, the company has indicated that it will likely take a different form, potentially as an electric vehicle.

The future of the Camaro remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the automotive landscape is constantly evolving, and automakers must adapt to survive. It remains to be seen how the Camaro will evolve in the future.

Having dissected the generational production numbers, and observed the ebb and flow dictated by market trends and design evolutions, it’s easy to overlook a crucial element: the physical spaces where these iconic cars came to life. The story of the Camaro isn’t just about engineering and marketing; it’s also about the assembly lines, the factory workers, and the geographical locations that shaped its identity.

Where the Magic Happened: Camaro Assembly Plants

The history of the Camaro is intrinsically linked to the assembly plants that birthed it. These weren’t just factories; they were the crucibles where raw materials were transformed into a cultural icon. Understanding where the Camaro was built is crucial to understanding its complete story.

Key Assembly Plants: A Geographical Overview

Several key assembly plants played pivotal roles in the Camaro’s production history. Each location brought its own unique context and contributed to the Camaro’s overall narrative:

• Norwood Assembly, Ohio:
  For many Camaro enthusiasts, Norwood is synonymous with the first-generation cars. This plant was a primary source for early Camaros and played a significant role in establishing the model’s initial success. It closed in 1987.

• Van Nuys Assembly, California:
  Located in the heart of Southern California, the Van Nuys plant was another vital hub for Camaro production. Its proximity to the lucrative California market and its experienced workforce made it a crucial asset for GM. It closed in 1992.

• Sainte-Thérèse Assembly, Quebec, Canada:
  This Canadian plant took over Camaro/Firebird production in 1993. It was the sole source for both models until the end of the fourth generation in 2002. It closed in 2002 with the cancellation of the F-body platform.

• Oshawa Car Assembly, Ontario, Canada:
  With the rebirth of the Camaro, production moved to Canada. The fifth-generation Camaro found its home in Oshawa. Production ended in 2015.

• Lansing Grand River Assembly, Michigan:
  The sixth-generation Camaro shifted production to the Lansing Grand River Assembly Plant. Which is the most recent home of the Camaro.

Production Shifts and Strategic Decisions

The movement of Camaro production between plants wasn’t arbitrary; it reflected strategic decisions by General Motors in response to changing market conditions, labor costs, and overall economic factors.

• Consolidation and Cost Efficiency:
  The shift to Sainte-Thérèse in the 1990s, for example, represented a move towards consolidating production and potentially reducing labor costs. This decision, while practical from a business perspective, also marked a shift away from the Camaro’s traditional American manufacturing base.

• Adapting to Market Demands:
  The relocation to Oshawa for the fifth generation signified a renewed commitment to the Camaro. However, it also reflected the evolving automotive landscape, where global manufacturing and supply chains had become increasingly prevalent.

• End of the Line:
  The move to Lansing Grand River for the sixth generation was about optimizing manufacturing synergies. It centralized production alongside other Cadillac models.

Regional Impact and Legacy

Each assembly plant left its own unique imprint on the Camaro’s legacy. The communities surrounding these plants often developed a strong sense of pride and connection to the model. The closure of plants like Norwood and Van Nuys marked the end of an era. It was not just for the automotive industry but also for the local economies that depended on them.

The story of the Camaro assembly plants is a reminder that the creation of an iconic car involves far more than just design and engineering. It involves the dedication and hard work of countless individuals. It involves the communities that supported those workers.

These plants are integral to the Camaro’s overall narrative.

Having dissected the generational production numbers, and observed the ebb and flow dictated by market trends and design evolutions, it’s easy to overlook a crucial element: the physical spaces where these iconic cars came to life. The story of the Camaro isn’t just about engineering and marketing; it’s also about the assembly lines, the factory workers, and the geographical locations that shaped its identity. Now, let’s shift our focus from the macro view of total production to the micro-level of specific models, specifically the coveted special editions that have defined the Camaro’s performance pedigree.

Examining the Elite: Special Edition Production

The Camaro’s history is punctuated by a lineage of special editions, each representing a unique blend of performance, style, and exclusivity. These models, often produced in limited quantities, have become highly sought-after by collectors and enthusiasts alike. A closer look at their production figures reveals fascinating insights into consumer preferences, manufacturer strategies, and the evolving landscape of the muscle car market.

Decoding the Rarity: Production Numbers of Key Special Editions

Understanding the production numbers of models like the Z/28, SS, ZL1, and 1LE is key to appreciating their value and historical significance.

The Z/28 Legacy

The Z/28, introduced in 1967, was designed to compete in the SCCA Trans-Am series. Its high-revving 302 cubic inch engine and track-focused suspension made it an instant icon.

Production numbers varied over the years, with the early models (1967-1969) generally being more valuable due to their lower production volumes and association with the Camaro’s initial success. Later Z/28s, particularly those from the second and third generations, saw higher production numbers but still maintained a dedicated following.

The Super Sport (SS) Appeal

The Super Sport (SS) package offered a more accessible performance upgrade, typically featuring larger displacement engines and sporty aesthetics.

SS models were often produced in greater numbers than the Z/28, reflecting their broader appeal and more affordable price point. The availability of the SS package across multiple generations also contributed to its higher overall production volume.

The ZL1: An Exercise in Exclusivity

The ZL1, particularly the first-generation model with its all-aluminum 427 cubic inch engine, represents the pinnacle of Camaro performance and rarity.

These were produced in extremely limited quantities, making them among the most valuable and sought-after Camaros ever built. Later ZL1 models, such as those from the fifth and sixth generations, saw slightly higher production numbers but still retained an aura of exclusivity due to their high performance and premium price.

The 1LE: Track-Focused Performance

The 1LE package, designed for road racing, offered a blend of performance and handling upgrades.

Production numbers for the 1LE varied depending on the generation, but it consistently represented a smaller percentage of overall Camaro production. Its focus on track performance limited its appeal to a niche market, resulting in lower production volumes compared to models like the SS.

Factors Influencing Special Edition Production

Several factors influenced the production numbers of these special editions:

• Market Demand: Consumer preferences played a significant role. Models like the SS, with its broader appeal, tended to be produced in higher numbers.

• Pricing and Positioning: Higher-priced, more exclusive models like the ZL1 naturally had lower production volumes.

• Engine Availability: The availability of specific engines, such as the high-performance 427 in the ZL1, limited production.

• Marketing and Promotion: Effective marketing campaigns could drive demand for specific special editions.

• Production Capacity: Manufacturing constraints and plant capacity also influenced production numbers.

• Racing Success: Racing success directly translated to sales for models like the Z/28 and 1LE.

The Allure of Limited Production

The limited production numbers of these special edition Camaros contribute significantly to their collectibility and value. Scarcity creates desire, and these models represent a unique chapter in the Camaro’s storied history. Understanding their production figures allows enthusiasts and collectors to appreciate their rarity and the factors that shaped their place in the automotive landscape. The Z/28, SS, ZL1, and 1LE embody not only the peak of Camaro performance but also the strategic decisions that dictated their availability and ultimately, their enduring legacy.

Sales Data and Market Position

Production numbers offer one perspective on the Camaro’s journey, but to truly understand its story, we must examine its sales data. These figures reflect consumer demand, market trends, and the Camaro’s positioning against its rivals, most notably the Ford Mustang.

Analyzing sales data reveals not just the Camaro’s popularity at different times, but also how effectively Chevrolet adapted to changing market conditions and consumer preferences.

Historical Sales Overview

The Camaro’s sales history is a rollercoaster, marked by periods of dominance and periods of struggle. The initial years saw strong sales, fueled by the muscle car craze. The oil crisis of the 1970s and the changing automotive landscape of the 1980s and 1990s significantly impacted sales.

The Camaro’s comeback in 2010 sparked renewed interest, but sales eventually tapered off, culminating in its discontinuation. Understanding these fluctuations is crucial to appreciating the Camaro’s market position.

Peaks and Valleys: Interpreting the Numbers

Identifying peak sales years reveals what resonated with buyers. Strong styling, potent engines, and competitive pricing all contributed to increased demand. For instance, the first-generation Camaro benefited from the burgeoning muscle car market, while the fifth-generation’s retro-inspired design struck a chord with enthusiasts.

Conversely, periods of low sales often coincided with economic downturns, increased competition, or perceived shortcomings in design or performance. The late 1980s and early 2000s witnessed a decline in muscle car sales as buyers shifted towards smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Camaro vs. Mustang: A Head-to-Head Comparison

The Camaro’s sales story cannot be told without considering its arch-rival, the Ford Mustang. The two cars have been locked in a battle for market supremacy since the Camaro’s inception. Comparing their sales figures reveals interesting dynamics.

There were periods when the Camaro outsold the Mustang, and vice versa. These shifts often reflect design trends, performance advantages, and marketing strategies. Analyzing these head-to-head battles provides valuable insights into the muscle car market and consumer preferences.

Impact of Special Editions on Sales

Special editions like the Z/28, SS, and ZL1 often generated buzz and increased showroom traffic, boosting overall sales. These models catered to enthusiasts seeking enhanced performance and exclusivity, attracting a specific segment of the market.

However, it’s important to note that special editions typically represented a small percentage of total sales. While they enhanced the Camaro’s image and appeal, they weren’t always the primary drivers of overall sales volume.

The Final Years: Understanding the Decline

The Camaro’s sales decline in its final years is a complex issue. Factors such as shifting consumer preferences towards SUVs and trucks, increased competition from other performance vehicles, and potentially a lack of innovation contributed to the downward trend.

Analyzing sales data from this period highlights the challenges faced by traditional muscle cars in a rapidly evolving automotive market. It also raises questions about Chevrolet’s strategy and whether more could have been done to sustain the Camaro’s appeal.

The Camaro’s sales story cannot be told without acknowledging the elephant in the room: the Ford Mustang. Comparing sales figures between these two rivals provides critical context, revealing not just the Camaro’s successes and failures, but also the broader dynamics of the pony car market. Ultimately, sales data underscores the Camaro’s place in automotive history, proving its ability to captivate enthusiasts and endure through changing trends.

Shocking Stats and Surprising Trends

Delving into the production numbers of the Camaro reveals more than just simple quantities; it uncovers a tapestry of unexpected findings and intriguing trends. These anomalies and shifts in production provide a fascinating glimpse into the factors that influenced the Camaro’s journey over the years.

The Mystery of Missing Numbers

One of the most striking aspects of Camaro production is the inconsistency in available data. While some years offer meticulously detailed records, others are shrouded in ambiguity. This lack of complete information creates an element of mystery and raises questions about the accuracy of publicly available figures.

Why are some years so well-documented, while others remain obscure?
Were there unreported production runs, or were records simply lost to time?

The answers to these questions may never be fully known, adding an aura of intrigue to the Camaro’s production history.

The Z/28 Anomaly

The Z/28, a performance-oriented variant of the Camaro, holds a special place in the hearts of enthusiasts. However, its production numbers reveal a surprising trend: While the Z/28 was highly desirable, its production figures often lagged behind those of more mainstream models.

This anomaly can be attributed to several factors:

• The Z/28 commanded a higher price tag, limiting its accessibility.
• Its performance focus appealed to a niche audience.
• Chevrolet may have intentionally limited production to maintain exclusivity.

Despite its relatively low production numbers, the Z/28 has become one of the most sought-after Camaros, commanding significant premiums in the collector car market.

The Fifth-Generation Surge and Subsequent Decline

The fifth-generation Camaro, launched in 2010, marked a triumphant return for the iconic muscle car. Initial production numbers soared, reflecting the pent-up demand from enthusiasts eager to embrace the retro-inspired design and modern performance.

However, this surge proved to be relatively short-lived. After the initial excitement subsided, production numbers gradually declined, culminating in the Camaro’s discontinuation. This trend raises questions about the sustainability of nostalgia-driven revivals and the challenges of maintaining long-term appeal in a rapidly evolving automotive market.

The Disappearing Convertibles

Convertible versions of the Camaro have always held a special allure, offering open-air thrills and a distinctive style. However, production numbers for convertibles often paled in comparison to those of their coupe counterparts.

Several factors contributed to this disparity:

• Convertibles typically command a higher price.
• They appeal to a smaller segment of the market.
• Some generations of the Camaro did not offer a convertible option at all.

As a result, Camaro convertibles are often rarer and more valuable, particularly those from limited-production years.

The Impact of External Factors

Camaro production numbers were not solely determined by internal factors such as design, performance, and marketing. External forces, such as economic conditions, fuel prices, and government regulations, also played a significant role.

• The oil crisis of the 1970s led to a decline in muscle car sales.
• Economic recessions dampened consumer spending.
• Emissions regulations forced automakers to reduce engine power.

These external factors created peaks and valleys in Camaro production, reflecting the broader economic and social landscape.

Regional Production Variations

Production of the Camaro was not always evenly distributed across different assembly plants. Some plants specialized in certain models or trim levels, leading to regional variations in production numbers.

For example, certain special editions or high-performance variants may have been exclusively produced at a specific plant, making those vehicles more common in that region. Understanding these regional production variations adds another layer of complexity to the Camaro’s production history.

Alright, gearheads, hope you found those Camaro production numbers as mind-blowing as we did! Now go forth and impress your friends with your newfound knowledge!